Thanks Sriram Gyan On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 11:53 AM Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Gyan, > > >Gyan>I understand the issue with the ASPA path verification, however if > the RS AS added to ASPA then that would influence the forwarding plane is > the issue. How do you insert RS AS for the ASPA path verification but not > allow RS to be part of forwarding plane? I guess you could do a > next-hop-unchanged between the clients connected through the RS. > > Is this the confirmation (from RFC7947, Sec. 2.2.1) that you are looking > for? > > "... As the route server > does not participate in the actual routing of traffic, the NEXT_HOP > attribute MUST be passed unmodified to the route server clients,..." > > Sriram > > > _______________________________________________ > Sidrops mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
