> WHAT? I'm suggesting that you not treat routes with the ANYCAST > community learned from R&E peers as if they are R&E routes, but as if > they are normal internet routes. > > I don't think you want to require or even recommend the removal of the > ANYCAST community at an EBGP boundary.
well, in this case, with 'you' == robert, he does want it removed :) fwiw, i don't. the signal is an attribute of the BGP_PATH not the peer. randy _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
