All I read the latest draft with the discussion updates and it looks good.
I agree an interesting discussion regarding WK Anycast community and most all the comments on ML. As Robert and few others mentioned I think providing a clear definition of Anycast would be good as well as length of the Anycast prefix for IPv4 and IPv6. Overall I support the idea WK Anycast community and use of local policy for import / export and trust policy. Looks foreword to the discussion next week. Kind Regards Gyan On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:40 AM Maximilian Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > after some discussion at RIPE84 we took the time to formalize a draft > to define a well-known BGP community to indicate a given prefix is > carrying Anycast traffic. The intent is to allow ISPs to do well > informed TE, especially in cases where they want to diverge from the > hot potato principle. > > You can find the draft at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wilhelm-grow-anycast-community/ > > Happy to share this at the upcoming meeting and hear your thoughts! > > Thanks and best, > Max > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
