Hi Jeff It sounds like everything is addressed in the TCP Yang model so we don’t need new NG TCP model as we had discussed during my IETF 114 presentation.
Just want to close the loop on that topic. Thank you Gyan On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 3:08 PM Jeffrey Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael, > > > On Sep 5, 2022, at 4:52 AM, Scharf, Michael < > [email protected]> wrote: > The authors have published version -08 to address feedback from various > reviewers, including your one. > > As you can see at the page > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-tcpm-yang-tcp-08, we added a > typedef for MSS and leafs for MSS and PMTUD. Please review this change and > let us know if this works for you. > > > Those changes address my comments. Thanks! > > We have _*not*_ added further nodes, as the use case is not clear and > there has been no specific suggestion how the draft should be updated. As > mentioned before, this document does not try to comprehensively model all > potential parameters of a TCP stack. > > > It's YANG. Unlike MIBs, as long as the structure is well-designed, it can > be extended later to address deficiencies. > > Thanks for the work. > > -- Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email [email protected] <[email protected]>* *M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
