Hi Authors, Grow WG, Warren, I don’t know RPSL, but reading the errata, and section 5.6 of that document, my instinct is that this errata is valid. Is anyone able to confirm please?
Regards, Rob From: Chris Smiley <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, 13 July 2023 at 22:00 To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Warren Kumari <[email protected]>, Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[email protected]> Cc: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2622 (7564) Greetings, This errata reports a problem with Section 86-13269662805/RFC2622. Upon further review, we believe it should point to Section 5.6/RFC2622. We have updated accordingly. Please let us know any concerns. Thank you. RFC Editor/cs > On Jul 13, 2023, at 6:31 AM, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2622, > "Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL)". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7564 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Jiang Li <[email protected]> > > Section: 86-13269662805 > > Original Text > ------------- > In page 26 of RFC2622 > In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from 9.9.9.2 > and 9.9.9.3. > (7) peering-set: prng-bar > peering: AS1 at 9.9.9.1 > peering-set: prng-foo > peering: prng-bar > peering: AS2 at 9.9.9.1 > aut-num: AS1 > import: from prng-foo accept { 128.9.0.0/16 } > > Corrected Text > -------------- > In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from 9.9.9.2 > and 9.9.9.3. > (7) peering-set: prng-bar > peering: AS3 at 9.9.9.1 > peering-set: prng-foo > peering: prng-bar > peering: AS2 at 9.9.9.1 > aut-num: AS1 > import: from prng-foo accept { 128.9.0.0/16 } > > Notes > ----- > As "Figure 22: Example topology consisting of three ASes, AS1, AS2, and > AS3; two exchange points, EX1 and EX2; and six routers." shows, the router > 9.9.9.1 of AS1 connects to the router 9.9.9.3 of AS3 in exchange point 2. It > states that "In the following example 9.9.9.1 imports 128.9.0.0/16 from > 9.9.9.2 and 9.9.9.3.", so I think the corresponding AS of 9.9.9.3 should be > AS3 instead of AS1. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC2622 (draft-ietf-rps-rpsl-v2-03) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Routing Policy Specification Language (RPSL) > Publication Date : June 1999 > Author(s) : C. Alaettinoglu, C. Villamizar, E. Gerich, D. Kessens, > D. Meyer, T. Bates, D. Karrenberg, M. Terpstra > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Routing Policy System > Area : Operations and Management > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
