Moin,
> I have one comment: > > "The AS_PATH of redistributed NLRI MUST NOT violate the valley-free > principle [RFC4012], i.e., [..]" > > There are more forms of route leaks than violations of "valley-free". > Also, I noticed the referenced RFC4012 does not actually mention the > term. I think you could remove this part of the bulletpoint, so start > with "The redistributing AS MUST be authorized [..]". I created a ticket; Will be addressed in -04 for after 120. > Otherwise, I am happy with the changes in 03. Thanks! Good to hear. With best regards, Tobias -- Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
