Hi Teun, Even if it does not significantly change the specification, readability and clarity are important, so thank you for this feedback.
On 24 Apr 2025, at 23:44, Teun Vink <[email protected]> wrote > A first general comment, is that to me it’s a bit weird that this > specification is about v4 of the NRTM protocol, without any reference to > older versions of the protocol other than to point out differences […] Fair point, we can elaborate on that a bit more. > 3.3: order of description of items > [...] I’m not sure why this order (delta, snapshots, update notification) was > chosen, to me it would have been more logical to read about snapshots first, > then the delta files and finally the update notifications. Yes, that makes more sense to me too, I'll look into changing it. I do not think this order was chosen on purpose. > In 3.3.1 (Publishing updates, delta files): > […] I think they could either be combined (‘The Delta File MUST include all > changes that happened during the time frame, in the order in which they > occurred, even if these changes cancel each other out’), or at least order of > these two items should be reversed. That would be clearer, indeed. I'll change it. Sasha _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
