Hi Med, Thank you for the input. Apart from the title, I meant to include more details about the manageability aspects (e.g. manual/automated configuration,...).
Regards, Giuseppe -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 7:28 AM To: Giuseppe Fioccola <[email protected]>; ops-dir <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-12 ietf last call Opsdir review Hi Giuseppe, Thanks for the review. On this one: Thakh s > From an OPSDIR point of view, I think it is good to have a section on > "Operational Considerations", as also highlighted in draft- > opsarea-rfc5706bis. > Maybe the section can be renamed as "Operations & Management > Considerations", adding more details about the management aspects. I suggest to maintain the current title of Section 5 (Operational Considerations) as it is. That's consistent with the guidance in draft-opsarea-rfc5706bis-06#section-3.1. Thank you. Cheers, Med > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Giuseppe Fioccola via Datatracker <[email protected]> Envoyé : > vendredi 24 octobre 2025 17:50 À : [email protected] Cc : > [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected] > Objet : draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats-12 ietf last call Opsdir > review > > > Document: draft-ietf-grow-bmp-bgp-rib-stats > Title: Advanced BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) Statistics Types > Reviewer: Giuseppe Fioccola > Review result: Has Nits > > This document defines new parameters in the BMP Statistics. It is > quite clear and well-written. > > From an OPSDIR point of view, I think it is good to have a section on > "Operational Considerations", as also highlighted in draft- > opsarea-rfc5706bis. > Maybe the section can be renamed as "Operations & Management > Considerations", adding more details about the management aspects. > I would also describe the typical application scenarios where the new > gauges are useful in order to allow the reader to better understand > the applicability. > > I have additional general comments: > > - I would add some considerations in the Introduction to explain the > background and the motivation for these new parameters. > > - Regarding the terminology, in RFC 7854 it is mentioned that Adj- > RIB-In is also referred to as the pre-policy Adj-RIB-In. Since they > are defined separately in this document, I would clarify this point to > avoid misunderstanding. I guess the same could apply to Adj-RIB-Out. > > - I suggest to improve the Security Considerations section, by > highlighting whether or not the new gauges add new security concerns > compared to RFC 7854. > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
