Ok, scratch the -13 part, forgot the 125 cutoff. ;-) On Fri, 2026-03-06 at 17:12 +0100, Tobias Fiebig wrote: > Moin, > > again, thanks! Finally managed to integrate the text you sent and > pushed a -13. > > Also would like to encourage the rest of the WG to review the > document > and provide feedback. ;-) This may be one of the shortest documents > to > give a read. ;-) > > With best regards, > Tobias > > On Thu, 2026-02-26 at 14:28 +0100, Martin Pels wrote: > > Hi Tobias, > > > > I just went through our earlier discussions and found two points in > > section 4.1 that did not return in a generalized form in the 02 > > (and > > later) version of the draft. > > > > I propose adding the following: > > > > * The AS_PATH for a received NLRI MUST NOT exceed the maximum > > length > > supported by the local router. > > > > * The number of BGP communities [RFC1997], extended BGP > > communities > > [RFC4360] and Large BGP communities [RFC8092] attached to a > > received NLRI MUST NOT exceed the maximum supported by the > > local router. > > > > And a nit in the abstract: > > > > "Due to this central nature, it is important to understand the > > security > > and reliability requirements that can and should be ensured to > > prevent > > accidental or intentional routing disturbances." > > > > ensured -> met > > > > Kind regards, > > Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > > GROW mailing list -- [email protected] > > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > > -- > Univ.Prof. Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig > T +31 616 80 98 99 > M [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
-- Univ.Prof. Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
