Hi Amanda,
Yes, this is essentially the whole purpose of this document. With some decoration on the why we are doing that.
Paolo On 12/3/26 12:55, Amanda Baber via RT wrote:
Dear Authors, Before the IETF meeting, we check working group agendas for documents with IANA-related issues. We have notes about this document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-adj-ribs-filtered-00 The document recommends assigning value 4 to the F Flag, but value 4 is already assigned to “F flag (DEPRECATED).” Does this undo RFC 9069's deprecation of the F flag? Please see https://www.iana.org/assignments/bmp-parameters If you have any questions, just let us know. If you'd like to talk in person, you can find us next to the RFC Editor's table from Monday through Thursday. You can also request another review at any time by contacting us at [email protected]. For more information about IANA Considerations section requirements, please see https://www.iana.org/help/protocol-registration Best regards, Amanda Baber IANA _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
