Moin Tobias, You are right, it's not an example but a well-known limit, many thanks for the fix!
Overall a very important update of previous BCP and I support publication of the document. Fedor --- Software Engineer Deutsche Telekom -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Tobias Fiebig <[email protected]> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. April 2026 11:48 An: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Betreff: [GROW] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-bgpopsecupd-14.txt Moin, > I read the draft and understand the idea of not to focus on specific > technical implementations and requirements. > > I'd like to suggest adding in section "Originating and Propagating BGP > Routes" more details - > > > Operators <bcp14>MUST NOT</bcp14> advertise BGP routes for prefixes > > that are not globally routable, including prefixes from bogon > > address space and prefixes more specific than commonly accepted > > global routing limits (e.g., longer than /24 for IPv4 or /48 for > > IPv6) I added the above text. However, in the spirit of longetivity, I would skip the e.g. part. Thoughts? With best regards, Tobias -- Univ.Prof. Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
