Hello, Thank you for your interest in this draft.
[[ As an aside, according to Pangram, "100%" of the email I am replying to is AI-generated, it indicated: "Result: This appears to be AI text that has been paraphrased or rewritten." I don't know to what extend the Pangram service is accurate, but a cursory review of the posting history shows a fair number of reviews were sent in a short period of time, which in my mind raises some questions. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?q=from%3Asaumya.dikshit%40hpe.com ]] In any case, I'll reply to the key point: On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 07:24:11PM +0000, Dikshit, Saumya via GROW wrote: > I have a few comments on operational safety. > > 1) Section 3.1 recommends marking downgraded traffic with the LE DSCP > at egress to the next network domain. Section 3.4 also says operators > should not remove the DOWNGRADE community. Together, these two points > mean that both the BGP signal and the packet treatment can continue > beyond the first receiving network. Yes. We consider it beneficial to propagate the signal. There is no reason for it to stop specifically at the first AS hop. > * It would clarify global propagation of the community does not imply > a globally identical traffic treatment contract. I don't think this ever was implied. Kind regards, Job _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
