On Feb 25, 2009, at 10:27:15, Quinn Taylor wrote: > I can understand why using growlnotify from normal apps would be > discouraged. However, I've found it useful for providing feedback > for Terminal tasks that take a while to complete, such as Ant > builds, shell scripts, background tasks, etc.
Certainly. That's its purpose. > Making growlnotify hard to install doesn't do anyone a favor until/ > unless there actually is a "better" way. There is, which is an Installer package. The hard part of that is wrestling with PackageMaker. > Even so, I'd be sad to see it go away, since it's a great little > utility. Agreed. We have no plans to kill it. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
