On May 7, 6:58 pm, Christopher Forsythe <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd agree on the growl side, but I'd disagree on that specific type of > implementation. I think there might be a better way to get things done.
Looking at this now, I agree - this would definitely be on the Growl side of things. Strange that I didn't think of it that way the first time. How would you implement it differently, though? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
