And then if you have 100 notifications, they come in very slowly, and forever. Thought of that already.
What if you had 1000 notifications? Think about how that would work. N should not be configurable, since we have the advanced screen overflowing that was introduced in 1.x. No, I don't misunderstand :) I just don't think you've thought of the whole problem. A rolodex system when we start detecting a notification flood is in my opinion better than this. Chris On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:42 PM, FrancoSanta <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think you misunderstood my point. > > I am saying something like this: > > if( numberOfCurrentNotificationsOnScreen() >= N ){ > HOLD_NOTIFICATIONS_TO_SHOW_LATER(); > } else { > SHOW_RIGHT_NOW() > } > > where N is a param that you can configure. > > > This way they won't fill up the screen, the will just fill up **PART** > of the screen. > > On Oct 12, 6:10 pm, Christopher Forsythe <[email protected]> wrote: > > We've had this on the list for years now. Unfortunately there's not a > simple > > way to do it that just makes sense. > > > > Currently the last idea was to group them by application, and then have > > arrows to the right and left to see the next/previous notification. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:27 PM, FrancoSanta <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I love Growl and use GrowlMail a lot for Mail.app but sometimes the > > > notifications fill my whole screen. > > > > > I want to be able to say to Growl to show just a number of > > > notifications at a time. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
