On May 18, 2011, at 03:24:21, JupiterMoonBeam wrote: > I think this would be an acceptable work around for the short term.
How would you implement usernames in the protocol, and how is that better than the username+password hash? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
