I don't want you to have to use smoke if you like Raarrr more. I'm more wanting to see if changing it helps narrow down the cause really for reproduction purposes on our end.
Webkit is an easy thing to either rule out or find cause, since it's a major differentiator that's easy to select. -- Chris Forsythe On Thursday, October 20, 2011 at 11:52 AM, [email protected] wrote: > Will do, but at this time it's just sitting at 60 megs. So it *might* > be solved. Fingers crossed ;).Although I liked Raarrr better than > Smoke. > On Oct 17, 5:37 pm, joelw135 <[email protected] (http://waxman.org)> wrote: > > How much memory should Growl be using? I know this answer is dependent > > on display type. > > > > On Oct 15, 9:39 am, vjacobs <[email protected] (http://gmail.com)> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > At this time Growl is using 612mb of RAM. I've noticed this behavior > > > in earlier versions too. It always seems to occur when it has been > > > running for a while. I also ran "leaks" on the > > > process:https://gist.github.com/1289567 > > > > > I'm running Growl 1.3 on Mac OS X 10.7.2 and I use the Raaarr display > > > style. > > > > > Hope this helps, don't know what other info I should provide :D. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Growl Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > (mailto:[email protected]). > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Growl Discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en.
