That still would've required the rewrite to be done and 1.3 to be released, or else everything that /was/ already in the MAS would stop working with Growl. Which wouldn't have made people happy either.
On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:33 AM, Phat Bob wrote: > Or hold off from going into the MAS surely? > > On 8 Nov 2011, at 19:15, Rachel Blackman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Nov 8, 2011, at 11:06 AM, Phat Bob wrote: >> >>> While I agree and support all this - what frustrates me is that all of >>> these changes have happened in one hit. >> >> Unfortunately, until November 2nd when Apple decided to push out the >> deadline to March of next year, the official deadline for 'everything has to >> work with sandboxing' was November 1st. Thus, Growl 1.3 /had/ to do all the >> sandboxing-related stuff in something of a hurry. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Growl Discuss" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/growldiscuss?hl=en. >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
