On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 7:23 PM, <scwingfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > The security document at https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/blob/master/ > SECURITY.md recommends OpenSSL and netty-tcnative for TLS support. > > I was wondering if ALPN support in Java 9 might change this > recommendation. That is, maybe the JDK's TLS support could be a more > viable option for grpc-java with Java 9? >
Yes, JDK 9 is an avenue for avoiding the binary requirements. But we don't yet have ALPN support working on JDK 9, so I'd be a bit longer until this works. We're also thankful they improved the AES GCM performance in JDK 9; it was *abysmal* previously. I'm planning on backporting the fix for this issue <https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/issues/3532> to the upcoming 1.8 release (ETA, one week). At that point it *may* be possible to use JDK 9, if you configure the SslContext a bit more yourself. However, we've not actually tried it ourselves yet. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to grpc-io@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/CA%2B4M1oPXGstgkX%3Duu8t82B0%3D9G8U6%3DDV3yyR_rVgPVmx_nHhWQ%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
