I picked `cxx` since I saw it before somewhere in gRPC code base and I thought that was a more common alias. But as Mark said, we are already using `cpp` in our current directory structure so I am totally good with `grpcpp`.
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 6:48:23 PM UTC-8, Srini Polavarapu wrote: > > Is the reason for choosing grpcxx (vs grpc_cpp or grpc_plusplus) is so > that it is inline with #ifndef GRPCXX_AAA_BBB_H usage in header files? > > On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 4:44:05 PM UTC-8, Muxi Yan wrote: >> >> grpc.io members, >> >> Please review gRFC proposal L22 >> <https://github.com/muxi/proposal/blob/grpc%2B%2B-to-grpcxx/L22-change-grpc%2B%2B-dir-name.md> >> which >> proposes changing the header directory of gRPC C++ library from >> `include/grpc++` to `include/grpcxx` for compatibility issue. Let me know >> any question, comment, or concern. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/3bd65683-23b3-41ee-a479-1c8a4998e58c%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
