What is the default exponential backoff configuration?

I have used dig on the DNS record and it is has a 30s expiration, so that 
does not seem to be the issue.

With regards to the JVM DNS caching, I tried setting a variety of 
properties and none of them seem to work.


I tried setting the following property right before my main, but it does 
not work.

object ClientDriver {

  java.security.Security.setProperty("networkaddress.cache.ttl", "20")

  def main(arg: Array[String]) = {

    // Code
    *....*
    
  }
}


I even tried setting the following system property which didn't work either

-Dsun.net.inetaddr.ttl=20



On Thursday, January 17, 2019 at 2:04:45 PM UTC-5, Kun Zhang wrote:
>
> Even though the first DNS refresh is too early to notice the new address, 
> as long as the old address is still returned, RoundRobin will continue 
> trying to connect to the old address (subject to exponential back-off of 
> Subchannel reconnections). Of course it will fail, but whenever it does, a 
> new DNS refresh will be triggered. Eventually you will get the new address.
>
> If you have waited long enough and still not seen the new address, it may 
> be due to the TTL of the DNS record, or more likely, JVM's DNS caching 
> <https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sdk-for-java/v1/developer-guide/java-dg-jvm-ttl.html>
> .
>
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 2:36:39 PM UTC-8, Yee-Ning Cheng wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a gRPC client using the default DnsNameResolver and 
>> RoundRobinLoadBalancer that is connected to gRPC servers on Kubernetes 
>> using the Kube DNS endpoint.  The servers are deployed as Kube pods and may 
>> fail.  I see that when a pod fails, the onStateChange gets called to 
>> refresh the DnsNameResolver.  The problem is that the new Kube pod that 
>> gets spun up in the old pod's place is not up yet when the resolver is 
>> trying to refresh the subchannel state and doesn't see the new pod.  And 
>> thus, the client is not able to see the new pod and does not connect to it.
>>
>> Is there a configuration I am missing or is there a way to refresh the 
>> resolver on a scheduled timer?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Yee-Ning
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"grpc.io" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/grpc-io.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/93bc0f43-468e-401c-ac39-dd6488b617ac%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to