Sounds like you are implementing a service that does some database I/O. Do you mean those referenced libraries provide ListenableFuture-based APIs, and you are asking about what executor to be passed to ListenableFuture.addListener()?
On Sunday, August 4, 2019 at 2:47:36 PM UTC-7, Derek Perez wrote: > > I have a stub that needs to do some database I/O and I wanted to make use > of ListenableFuture from Guava, wondering what the best approach to doing > that would be? > I ran into this explanation of the overall server architecture: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/grpc-io/LrnAbWFozb0/VYCVarkWBQAJ > > It seems like the application executor I pass in would be where I would > want to do this work, so, does that mean that within a stub I should call > this? > > https://guava.dev/releases/23.0/api/docs/com/google/common/util/concurrent/MoreExecutors.html#newDirectExecutorService-- > > assuming that directExecutor() within a stub execution gives me the > application executor, would that be correct? Also assuming its OK to block > there. For more context I intend to use > https://github.com/brettwooldridge/HikariCP and > https://github.com/impossibl/pgjdbc-ng to do the DB communication at stub > execution time, in case there are other gotchas to be aware of. > > Thanks! > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/c524128f-6f26-43ee-bb32-8ac5a07e1bb8%40googlegroups.com.
