Thank you for clarifying! On Monday, May 4, 2020 at 11:19:31 AM UTC-5, Eric Anderson wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 3:21 PM <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Interesting - thank you very much! I did see this in the StreamObserver >> doc >> <https://grpc.github.io/grpc-java/javadoc/io/grpc/stub/StreamObserver.html> >> : >> >> "Since individual StreamObservers are not thread-safe, if multiple >> threads will be writing to a StreamObserver concurrently, the >> application must synchronize calls" >> > > That documentation is correct, and gRPC framework abides by it as well. > StreamObservers are not-thread-safe so the caller has to synchronize, if > necessary. > > It seems like Christoph was describing *calling into* a StreamObserver. > And yes, he is correct, if you call into a StreamObserver from multiple > threads, you must synchronize them yourself. But it sounded like you were > talking *being called*, in which case you don't need to manage > synchronization. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/b52f02c2-8f0a-4a6b-961d-9e9105ba16b0%40googlegroups.com.
