I realized my premise was incorrect, this project isn't replacing tonic or prost. Good luck with your project!
On Monday, June 17, 2024 at 4:47:02 AM UTC-5 Martin Charles wrote: > Hey all, > > Doug, could you please say a bit more about your plans and the value you > plan to bring here? I'm skeptical of Google being involved here with the > intent of consuming the tonic project. Based on the quality of the protobuf > libraries in Python and Node, I'm skeptical Google has the bandwidth to > care and it's unclear what benefit Google capturing this library brings the > community. If Google has complex features Google needs, why should the > community deal with the complexity of Google use cases? I'd like to hear > this message from the tonic maintainers rather than some guy at Google. > On Tuesday, May 28, 2024 at 11:21:36 AM UTC-5 Ђорђе Милановић wrote: > >> Hi team, >> >> could you provide an estimate on when the official library might be ready >> for the release? >> Understanding the timeline would really help with our project planning. >> >> Thanks, in advance! >> Djordje Milanovic >> понедељак, 22. април 2024. у 18:57:20 UTC+2 Doug Fawley је написао/ла: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 8:55 PM Daz Wilkin <daz.w...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm curious as to what it means for Google (gRPC team) to contribute >>>> (!?) to tonic and why this is necessary. >>>> >>> >>> gRPC is a CNCF <http://cncf.io> project >>> <https://www.cncf.io/projects/grpc/>. Google significantly funds it, >>> but it is OSS-first. Tonic is a different OSS project which is more >>> independent. The plan is to contribute a new channel and server >>> implementation into the tonic repo, utilizing tonic's "generic" gRPC >>> implementation, and also to move tonic to the gRPC organization on >>> github <https://github.com/grpc> (probably with the repo name >>> "grpc-rust"). We will be using the "grpc" crates.io name >>> <https://crates.io/crates/grpc> which the previous owner Stepan Koltsov >>> <https://github.com/stepancheg> was gracious enough to donate to the >>> project as well. >>> >>> Presumably it results from Google's own increased adoption of Rust. >>>> Hopefully, it will lead to Google Cloud providing Cloud Client libraries >>>> in >>>> Rust too ;-) >>>> >>> >>> We certainly hope so too! :) >>> >>> >>>> Small gripe: that you are only soliciting adopters who are corporate >>>> developers (with a "company" and a "role/title") >>>> >>> >>> That was not our intent. Feel free to enter anything into these fields >>> that you feel is appropriate. (E.g. "independent" and "developer".) >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 2:59 PM Amelia <ame...@tortie.io> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm very excited for this! Is the idea to replace tonic? Fork it? Will >>>> you be working together with the protobuf team as they implement native >>>> rust support ( >>>> https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/tree/main/rust)? Will the >>>> official gRPC implementation include support for common ecosystem packages >>>> like tower? >>> >>> >>> As mentioned above, the goal is ultimately to replace the channel and >>> server parts, since there are some API changes that will be needed in order >>> to bring in the complete gRPC feature set. We're still very early in >>> design, so it's unclear exactly how all of it will look. Using tower, >>> specifically, seems to involve some trade-offs and I'm not yet ready to >>> commit either way until I understand them more. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Doug >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "grpc.io" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to grpc-io+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/grpc-io/c8143b72-4f5a-4270-b43e-b7962d8872edn%40googlegroups.com.
