"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the name "menu.lst" is really strange, so I don't like it. But I > don't know if grub.cfg is nice. What do you think? I sometimes think > that "grubrc" might be better (like "bashrc").
I like grub.cfg. > Next thing. I think it is a bad idea to make the variable for a menu > global, because this is not compatible with having multiple nested > menus. But some commands want to access information on the environment > (such as current menu). I can think of two ways to address this issue: > > 1. Pass one more argument to each command. This argument would be a > pointer to struct context, and contains a pointer to current menu, etc. > > 2. Provide global functions to access information. These functions would > have to use global variables. With 2 you mean that the function accesses the current menu all the time? Is accessing another menu useful in some cases? Thanks, _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
