On Dec 22, 2007 3:04 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How well does compression work for GRUB 2 ? core.img is already compressed > (with lzo); if LZMA makes better results perhaps it'd be a good idea to > switch.
in fact, lzma is must better than lzo, a simple test with stage2 from grub 0.97: original: 99834 lzo : 70945 lzo -9 : 60546 lzma: 51402 For compressed image core.img: original: 65045 lzma: 60087 -- Bean _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
