On Tuesday 25 December 2007 10:32, Robert Millan wrote:
> Any comments on this one?
>
> It seems to me that the module dependency hack doesn't take into account
> gcc internal symbols.
>
> Maybe skipping symbols starting with _ (or __?) would suffice ?

If this is easy, I think it would be better to add symbols defined in libgcc 
into kernel-defined symbols on ppc (as well as on sparc?).

Okuji


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to