On Jan 24, 2008 9:42 PM, Oleg Strikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Previous behavior was working correctly. You have to handle > > >> errorcodes > > >> at some point and that means when error is handled it is zeroed (or > > >> GRUB_ERR_NONE). So code is in callee where that loop was. > > > > >I suggest that we never set grub_errno to 0 (except the > > initialization). > > >That would match the standard errno behavior: > > > > >http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/errno.html > > <http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/errno.html> > > > > >-- > > >Regards, > > >Pavel Roskin > > > But is it correct to check and handle errno in some `library` function > (now we do) ? I CAN, but i do not have to examine errno after each > non-error-free call; is it right? > >
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
