On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 8:09 PM, Javier Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > El lun, 16-06-2008 a las 19:47 +0800, Bean escribió: >> Well, I did some testing a while ago, the result is in: >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2007-12/msg00114.html >> >> Even with lzo compressed image core.img, lzma can save up to 5K. >> > You mean that even with an already compressed LZO image, LZMA can > further compress it another 5 KB? Then I guess we're in! The only > problem of LZMA that could become a blocker is it's expansive memory > use, but the core image is small enough not to need more that a few KBs > of memory for decompression, I hope.
Hi, But do we really need those space ? I think lzo is working fine, we should avoid switching unless there is a good reason to do so. -- Bean _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
