On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 03:54:44 +0200 "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > Thank all of you for making effort on moving the version control > system to Subversion. I think this is a big improvement, and I like > it. > > Now, I would like to talk about the structure. Currently, it looks > like this: > > trunk/ > grub/ > grub2/ > tags/ > release*/ > branches/ > prepare*/ > > IMO, this is not very convenient. This means that, when we want to > create, say, version 1.99, we would tag both grub and grub2. This > does not sound good to me. > > So, I think that this would be more appropriate: > > grub/ > trunk/ > tags/ > branches/ > grub2/ > trunk/ > tags/ > branches/ > > Since grub and grub2 are totally different, it would be better to > segregate them completely this way. > > What is your opinion? I agree! Your suggestion seems very logical. Can we simply copy trunk/grub2 to grub2/trunk (and so on for the other "branches")? Then those of us mirroring the subversion tree might be able to just switch to the new URL for trunk... I hope. Regards, Colin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
