On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:03:27AM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > >> Well, ok. So thus we are indeed fixing a problem in Lenny inside > >> GRUB? On IRC someone said this was *not* the case. I am very > >> confused... > > > > Yeah sorry it is very confusing. > > I want (wanted ?) to have that problem _for_ lenny fixed. > > And I do not want to compromise the code quality because of a release > schedule ;-)
Would all of you please stop talking about debian and lenny? This is about a bug in GRUB. :-/ The only thing I said, is that it is easier for us (debian) if the bug is fixed before Bean's RAID refactoring. But the problem will still be there after that is merged. Anyway, please let's not waste time in this discussion. It's only a matter on which patch goes first. If Bean wants to checkin his code first, then it just means we'll need to adjust the raid.c part a bit, and that's all. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
