On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 02:23:32PM +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > > > > Why not use PCI ID to support this particular card? This way Donald doesn't > > have to support all cards, but the base is laid out so more cards can be > > added > > in the future. > > I have nothing against that. But in any case I think there has to be > this override functionality support. Just make it a bit harder for user > to type so they know it is advanced feature :).
How about implementing the flag but not listing it in --help output, and not documenting it (oh wait, we didn't document serial.mod anyway ;-)) ? > Of course you can dynamically check if PCI module is there and > then ask identification information from there. Sounds good. But do we have support for "weak" symbol dependencies a la dlym() ? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
