On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:43:09PM +0100, Christian Franke wrote: > > > >How would the whole picture look like? Sounds like it'd mean less > >complexity > >in external modules at the expense of more complexity in the build system. > > Here a first proof-of-concept patch, uses hello.c as the external module. > > If kernel is compiled with other GRUB_ABI_VER_SYM, insmod fails with: > "error: the symbol 'grub_abi_ver_1_96' not found"
Ah, it's much simpler than I thought. > +#define GRUB_ABI_VER_SYM grub_abi_ver_1_96 I assume between releases we'd add a counter after the version number? Like grub_abi_ver_1_96_X or so? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
