There are any objections for this patch? Without this grub wont work in PowerPC when using newer ld version. thanks
On Thu, 2008-12-04 at 12:08 -0200, Manoel Rebelo Abranches wrote: > Hi made a patch to add --build-id=none to TARGET_LDFLAGS instead of > MODULE_LDFLAGS. with this it is passed to ld when linking kernel.elf. > > without this kernel.elf creates a additional LOAD segment with a virtual > address in PhysAddr witch causes problem with OF and causes > grub-mkelfimage to not work correctly. > > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:34 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 19:14 +0200, Vesa Jääskeläinen wrote: > > > > > No no. I mean just KERNEL_LDFLAGS like comparison to MODULE_LDFLAGS. No > > > elf or nothing like that. Is there any problem if one provides this > > > setting even on x86 if linker recognizes it? (what is being tested > > > here). PPC_BUILD_ID_FLAG just sounds too specific. > > > > > > Isn't EFI also using ELF? I assume this would be beneficial also there. > > > > I agree, we should not be be multiplying hacks. There is already code > > adding -Wl,--build-id=none to TARGET_LDFLAGS. It's a macro > > grub_PROG_LD_BUILD_ID_NONE in aclocal.m4. What's wrong with it? Does > > it fail to add -Wl,--build-id=none on PowerPC or is TARGET_LDFLAGS not > > used to link kernel.elf? > > > > What are the symptoms caused by not using -Wl,--build-id=none? > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel -- Best Regards, Manoel Abranches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IBM Linux Technology Center Brazil _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
