On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:14:18PM +0800, Bean wrote:
> diff --git a/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk b/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk
> index 640ceda..18c108e 100644
> --- a/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk
> +++ b/conf/sparc64-ieee1275.rmk

Don't bother updating sparc64-ieee1275.rmk, it's completely broken by now.

>  void
>  grub_term_register_input (grub_term_input_t term)
>  {
> -  term->next = grub_term_list_input;
> -  grub_term_list_input = term;
> -  if (! grub_cur_term_input)
> -    grub_term_set_current_input (term);
> +  grub_handler_register (&grub_term_input_class, GRUB_AS_HANDLER (term));
>  }

Is grub_handler_register() always used this way?  Perhaps it should be
inline.

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to