Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:43:17 Bean wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Bean <bean12...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <ok...@enbug.org>
wrote:
I've undone r2063, since we're still discussing how to / not to split
modules. Bean, you must respect teamwork. If you are unable to follow
such a fundamental rule, I will have to disable your permission.
Hi,
I thought the previous mail is about replacing grub_printf with
grub_dprint, I'm ok with that. This patch has been in mail list for
sometime, it is essential to get a working display in intel macs.
Hi,
How about this patch ? The split is necessary as it introduces new
command loadbios and fakebios that uses the fake_bios_data function,
and it would be ugly to put them all inside linux.c.
Do you have any strong reason to make loadbios and fakebios separate? I think
the overhead is negligible.
this module is useful in conjunction with other loaders (multiboot, bsd,
pc_chainloader) as well
Regards,
Okuji
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
--
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
