On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 06:10:53PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Hello! > > It seems to me that the code quality has decreased in the last weeks. > In the same time, we have a growing number of compiler warnings. It > looks like there is a relationship between the two. > > I'll appreciate if everybody who recently contributed to GRUB looks at > the remaining warnings and fixes at least some of them. I don't mean > hiding the warnings, e.g. adding casts where using different types would > be more appropriate or initializing variables gcc claims to be > uninitialized without making sure that gcc is indeed wrong. But if > there is a good fix, it should be applied.
Can we start using -Werror ? If we can't do it globally, at least for individual modules. This way we gradually prevent regressions in more areas, and (hopefully) at some point get rid of them. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
