On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Pavel Roskin<pro...@gnu.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 22:20 +0200, Christian Franke wrote: >> Many "GNU GRUB version 1.96" used in production are likely builds from >> more recent SVN snapshots. It would (IMO) be useful to have some info >> about the actual installed version. > > I can tell from my experience with other projects that such suggestions > appear when there is not enough leadership in the project, and nobody > cares about producing stable releases. I personally care of making a stable release. Unfortunately I have no such authority. Only Marco and Okuji have. The usefulness of such patch isn't limited to semi-fix the lack of stable release it's also useful for developers and testers to be sure that new version was indeed installed > > It would be better to produce named prereleases or release candidates if > we are not comfortable about releasing 1.97 right now. 1.97 is a pre-release anyway. The release would be 2.00 > > -- > Regards, > Pavel Roskin > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
-- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
