>On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Pavel Roskin<addr...@hidden> wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:18 +0200, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> >>> There is strictly no need to do this restructuration. The real bug is >>> different fix would be setting dev->disk->partition to 0 before >>> calling grub_disk_read and restoring it afterwards. This part of code >>> is changed anyway with my nested partition patch and I was hoping it >>> could be applied quickly. Could you test nestpart branch of my >>> repository? With your version exerything seems to work fine. Thanks a lot. >> >> I'm not comfortable to approve a 60k long patch that reorganizes the >> code and fixed numerous bugs in the same time. I'm sure bugs can be >> fixed separately. >> >It fixed bugs because it replaced some parts of code with new >constructions. So basically wht you ask is to do some work and then >abandon, it additionally spending time rediffing patches. Similar >thing happens when you ask to split patches but then all split go in >without any discussion. Sorry, but this is just useless work >> -- >> Regards, >> Pavel Roskin >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Grub-devel mailing list >> addr...@hidden >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >> > > > >-- >Regards >Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko > >Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git
-- Jean-Pierre Flori _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
