On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 23:25 +0200, Javier Martín wrote: > With the reduced version of the patch I'm putting forward, such a > (hypothetical, indeed) change will only impact types.h, while otherwise > many source files will need to be modified in a hunt for "%ll"s and > their variations. We can consider "lower" types safe since the > autopromotion rules will keep the compiler happy even if int becomes > 64-bit.
OK, I'm fine with this change. It would only address the problem we have now (long vs .long long for 64-bit types) without trying to anticipate what other platforms we may support. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
