On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Pavel Roskin<pro...@gnu.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 11:14 +0200, Yves Blusseau wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Pavel, is it ok to commit the patch so we can generate boot.img from >> OSX ? (using L_ label as far as i remember). > > In response to that patch, I was requested to create a private grub > repository with separate branches for every patch. > > I'll need to do that or write an explanation why I won't do it. At the > moment, I don't have time for either of that. > This wasn't specific for the patch. Neither was it a requirement, but more an idea. It's your work and you can choose to do it the way you like. > I don't think it would be a good idea to commit a patch if there is a > pending request for action and no approvals, especially since it was a > request for testing. > > Besides, this patch only fixes one file. We have several images that > need the same treatment. Since Yves is interested perhaps he could do the "dirty job" of applying repetitive fixes and testing different images? And submit a patch then? > Also, the problem with lnxboot.S spilled into > the build system. This will need to be cleaned up as well. > > -- > Regards, > Pavel Roskin > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
-- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
