On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 05:06:46PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote: > Robert Millan wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Christian Franke wrote: >> >>>> First of all, I'm worried that we have discussions to decide things and >>>> they >>>> are later forgotten or ignored. Bean, please can you provide some >>>> explanation >>>> on what happened? >>>> >>>> Also, I think this commit should be reverted (at least the part that adds >>>> grub-pe2elf). >>> I would regret this. Then you could also revert all my Cygwin related >>> additions (some also included in Bean's r1726) because these no >>> longer make much sense unless someone fixes BFD or maintains a ELF >>> toolchain for Cygwin. >>> >> >> But we supported Cygwin before grub-pe2elf. What has changed? >> >> > > Since ~r1584, util/grub-* could be build and run on Cygwin. Commit r1726 > added support to build kernel and modules on Cygwin.
There has to be more to it. I know you were using GRUB on Cygwin before that commit. Was this kludge being used since the beginning? What are the other options? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel