On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 03:25:26PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote: > Am Freitag, den 31.07.2009, 18:19 +0200 schrieb Robert Millan: > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:45:35AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote: > > > > Felix Zielcke escribió: > > > > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed. > > > > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully > > > > > comes before December) > > > > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December. > > > > > > I don't see anything wrong with being "under development". I hope that > > > GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97. I don't see how > > > Debian can have any problem with that. > > > > It depends. If we say GRUB 2 is "under development" but we don't say > > anything > > about GRUB Legacy, people might think GRUB 2 is not ready. > > > > I agree with Pavel, saying GRUB 2 is under development doesn't fail to the > > truth, but then again there are many ways of saying the truth. I think we > > should make the website give a clear message that: > > > > a) GRUB Legacy is obsolete and we don't longer support it > > > > b) GRUB 2 is more mature than GRUB Legacy > > > > Good idea. I just think that I'm not good at proposing a good wording > for it. > And maybe we should wait untill 1.97 gets released before telling grub2 > is more mature then grub-legacy.
Agreed. We don't want to lead anyone into using 1.96. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
