> 8) COPYING contains GPLv2. fdl.texi isn't imported. I'm not a lawyer but following is my analysis AFAICT only example kernel is under GPL (v2 to be precise) the rest is either custom license, unclaimed copyright or non-copyrightable. IMO multiboot specification should be FDL with cover text "Multiboot specification" example kernel should be under permissive license. configure.ac in GRUB2 could be moved to GPLv3+ instead of permissive license (now both GRUBs have this file under all-permissive license) (in multiboot module if we put it under GPLv3+, license will be bigger than covered file) autogen.sh is small AUTHORS, ChangeLog and NEWS (whatever remains of these files) are probably uncopyrightable INSTALL and README will be smaller once GRUB-specific parts are ditched. I would put them under FDL for uniformity -- Regards Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko
Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
