On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 03:42:24PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > I'm afraid I don't agree that the solution to documenting changes is not > to document anything. That may be a little harsh, but I firmly believe > that documentation is key to acceptance.
It's OK. Well my concern is about long-term maintainability. We're very busy all the time, and redundancy in our codebase often results in birot. Can I count on your commitment that you'll be around to adjust this documentation if it gets out of sync, etc? -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel