On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 03:42:24PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> I'm afraid I don't agree that the solution to documenting changes is not  
> to document anything.  That may be a little harsh, but I firmly believe  
> that documentation is key to acceptance. 

It's OK.  Well my concern is about long-term maintainability.  We're very
busy all the time, and redundancy in our codebase often results in birot.

Can I count on your commitment that you'll be around to adjust this
documentation if it gets out of sync, etc?

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."


_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to