So grubinst bootcode seems superior over grub2 bootcode regarding
partitions?
ede
On 28.01.2010 17:57, Bean wrote:
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:39 AM,<edgar.sol...@web.de> wrote:
I am pretty sure. If you want I am willing to retry.
Still I wonder what is the deifference to the grubinst/g2ldr approach and
why the boot code can find g2ldr. Can it read fat fs?
Hi,
Yeah, grubinst contains its own fs reader, it's all written in
assembly, 1 sector fat + 1 sector ext2 + 4 sector ntfs plus other
utilities. The whole size is about 8K.
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
