also sprach Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> [2010.07.02.1513 +0200]: > Does anyone object to this simple scheme? > > /dev/md/NAME => (md/NAME) > all other md device name formats as before
That's what I use in the mdadm package too. > As far as I'm aware, we don't use slashes in GRUB device names right > now, so this is a bit novel; but I wanted to minimise the chance of > clashes and confusion, and I don't believe using a slash should actually > do any harm. You could use a dash like LVM too. And do keep in mind that named arrays still have a super-minor field with the number, just like the 0.9 metadata ones, so you don't have to use names. But I agree that it's better. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madd...@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen." -- albert einstein
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
