On 08/15/2010 12:59 PM, Fam Zheng wrote: > Hi, > > `os-prober` was not able to detect recent MINIX installations, so we > patched for the new detection and sent the patch to Debian, it's found at: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2010/08/msg00282.html > > MINIX is now able to be Multibooted besides chainloading, so it's > necessary to handle the result of os-prober accordingly. The patch for > GRUB 2 is made then, to generate a Multiboot menu entry when detected > system type is "minix". > > Patch content: > > === modified file 'util/grub.d/30_os-prober.in <http://30_os-prober.in>' > --- util/grub.d/30_os-prober.in <http://30_os-prober.in> 2010-07-04 > 22:45:14 +0000 > +++ util/grub.d/30_os-prober.in <http://30_os-prober.in> 2010-08-13 > 11:31:07 +0000 > @@ -197,6 +197,23 @@ > } > EOF > ;; > + minix) > + case ${LONGNAME} in > + Minix*) Why do you need to check LONGNAME separately? This shouldn't be necessary. > + cat << EOF > +menuentry "${LONGNAME} (on ${DEVICE}, Multiboot)" { > +EOF > + save_default_entry | sed -e "s/^/\t/" > + prepare_grub_to_access_device ${DEVICE} | sed -e "s/^/\t/" > + cat << EOF > + multiboot /boot/image_latest is it always named like this? Is /boot never a mountpoint? > +} > +EOF > + ;; > + *) > + echo " ${LONGNAME}(multiboot) is not yet supported" >&2 > + esac > + ;; > *) > echo " ${LONGNAME} is not yet supported by grub-mkconfig." >&2 > ;; > > > -- > Best Regards! > Fam Zheng > > > _______________________________________________ > Grub-devel mailing list > Grub-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel >
-- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
