On 26.09.2012 00:06, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:04:31PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: >> It's a reasonable argument, yes. If we do this, I think it should be >> upstream, as in the following patch. What do folks on grub-devel think? > > Oops, forgotten ChangeLog entry: > > 2012-09-25 Colin Watson <[email protected]> > > * Makefile.util.def (grub-mknetdir): Move to $prefix/bin. >
Go ahead.
>> === modified file 'Makefile.util.def'
>> --- Makefile.util.def 2012-09-22 20:19:58 +0000
>> +++ Makefile.util.def 2012-09-25 21:48:23 +0000
>> @@ -487,8 +487,8 @@ script = {
>> };
>>
>> script = {
>> - mansection = 8;
>> - installdir = sbin;
>> + mansection = 1;
>> + installdir = bin;
>> name = grub-mknetdir;
>>
>> common = util/grub-mknetdir.in;
>
--
Regards
Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
