On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 01:37:38AM +0400, Andrey Borzenkov wrote: > В Tue, 1 Jan 2013 14:42:04 +0000 > Colin Watson <cjwat...@ubuntu.com> пишет: > > * If a hook requires more than one local variable from its parent > > function, declare "struct <name-of-parent>_ctx" with the necessary > > variables, and convert both the hook and the parent to access the > > variables in question via that structure. > > Personally I find "ctx" part a bit confusing. It is not really execution > context in usual sense, it is just collection of random variables. I > would rather go with "struct <name-of-parent>_data" here.
I'm fine with that (and this is exactly why I posted this for a bit of a bikeshedding opportunity :-) ). Vladimir, any opinions on the naming? -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@ubuntu.com] _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
